Vulture

Skip to content, or skip to search.

oscar race 2012

With No Clear Oscar Front-runners, Studios Think Blockbusters Have a Shot Against the Indies

With the Oscars' host slot safely filled, Academy voters and movie execs are realizing that something else is missing at this year's Oscars: any obvious Best Picture front-runners who will define the race. Yes, there are movies that are getting great reviews — Hugo, The Artist, The Descendants — but there isn't that towering leader that, with its wave of media attention, becomes the focal point of the awards season; there's no Brokeback Mountain vs. Crash, The Social Network vs. The King's Speech. And now, studios are feeling like this year's GOP presidential nominees: Even if they don't feel like they have a clear chance of winning, none of their competitors do either, so why not keep your hat in the ring? “Usually, if you don’t want to spend the money on a campaign, you can say, ‘Look at how things are lining up! We don’t have a prayer!’” said Russell Schwartz, a movie marketing consultant who previously served as the marketing chief at New Line Cinema during its much-heralded Lord of the Rings era. “But right now, you can’t do that: You can’t really tell any of your clients that there isn’t a decent chance [of getting a nomination].” And as a result, you're seeing studios make more of a Best Picture fight for mainstream flicks for which they ordinarily would have been happy just counting their grosses, like the Harry Potter finale and Rise of the Planet of the Apes.

This year, indie movies have less of an advantage; there are fewer being made because so many smaller shingles and studio specialty divisions have shut down, and none of the 2011 crop are really breaking out the way that, say, Hurt Locker did in 2009. That leaves an opening for the studios for broader fare. (In this year's new system, there will be anywhere between five and ten Best Picture nominees.) Right behind Harvey Weinstein’s tub-thumping of the silent black-and-white arthouse release The Artist, there’s a black-and-white drama of a different kind: DreamWorks’ The Help. And while almost everyone sees Fox Searchlight’s release of Alexander Payne’s The Descendants to be a credible nominee, Twentieth Century Fox thinks it's possible that they could get a berth for their sleeper hit Rise of the Planet of the Apes. Warner Bros. Pictures is pushing not just Steven Soderbergh’s Contagion, but also mounting a massive effort to get director David Yates’s final Harry Potter film a Best Picture nomination as well. “And then there’s Super 8,” says one former marketing chief. “Paramount will do anything for J.J. [Abrams]. If he says ‘Jump!’ they’ll say, ‘How many people would you like us to kill before we land?’”

Even with this mix of budgets big and small, the race lacks clarity. The early awards have established no narratives, with the New York Film Critics Circle siding with The Artist for best picture and director this week, while the National Board of Review went with Hugo. “When the early results are this disparate, there’s no clear front-runner” says Terry Curtin, currently president of theatrical Marketing at Relativity Media and an Academy member herself. “And the last two days haven’t made us any smarter.” Further muddying the handicapping are two as-yet-unknown quantities: DreamWorks' Steven Spielberg–directed War Horse has only just begun screening and word of mouth is positive with some notable detractors, so it’s too early to tell if it’s headed for the winner’s circle or the glue factory. And while Paramount’s adaptation of Jonathan Safran Foer’s novel Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close has what one marketing executive jokingly refers to as “the recipe for Oscar pie” — a Stephen Daldry film (The Reader, The Hours) starring Tom Hanks (Forrest Gump, Philadelphia) and Sandra Bullock (The Blind Side) written by Eric Roth (The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, Munich) produced by Scott Rudin (The Social Network, True Grit, No Country for Old Men) — it's still a question mark, as the movie was not even finished in time to screen for the NYFCC before they could do their awards voting.

Many see an upside to a ceremony more populated by popcorn fare. Ratings certainly go up when blockbuster hits are nominated, which is important considering audiences have famously been shrinking since the lofty Titanic peak of 55 million viewers in 1998. When the highest-grossing film of all-time, Avatar, was nominated for Best Picture in 2009, the telecast's downward slide was briefly halted, and it pulled in some 41.3 million viewers, making it the most-watched broadcast since 2005. By comparison, in 2008 the Best Picture race was comprised of eventual winner No Country for Old Men, Atonement, Michael Clayton, There Will Be Blood, and Juno, the only box-office hit: The awards got their lowest ratings since 1974.

And yet, for people to tune in to root for a blockbuster, they need to care deeply about it, which is different from just going to see it along with millions of others. “The question is: Is this a wide-open race because no one loves any one movie enough for it to be the front-runner?’” asks Terry Press, the former DreamWorks' publicity doyenne who helped get American Beauty the studio's first Oscar, and who now runs her own marketing consultancy. “It’s a good thing if it’s based on quality … " She trails off, trying to be diplomatic. “I don’t think it’s a wide-open field because there’s such a breadth of greatness. You can expect seven nominees of movies that people really like, but not seven movies they feel passionate about. I don’t feel a ‘heat’ coming out of this race. When there’s a two- or three-horse race, that's what there is: heat. Instead, I hear the words ‘admire’ and ‘respect’ a lot. And there’s the difference: You ‘admire’ with your head, and you feel with your heart. That’s the interesting thing about this year.”

Schwartz agrees, saying, “The people who are doing the grunt work have their work cut out for them. As a passive observer who’s also an Academy member, there’s just nothing that jumps out of my mailbox and has to go into my DVD player.” For voters like Schwartz, their last hope for a front-runner is War Horse or Extremely Loud. If those disappoint, well, don't be surprised if you start seeing Best Picture For Your Consideration ads for Transformers: Dark of the Moon. (UPDATE: Turns out there already are FYC Best Picture ads for Transformers. So maybe Hollywood will finally get that Transformers/The Artist face-off that it has been waiting for.)

Photo: Warner Bros (Harry Potter), Fox Searchlight (The Descendants), Warner Bros. France (The Artist), 20th Century Fox (Apes)