• Intelligencer
  • The Cut
  • Vulture
  • The Strategist
  • Curbed
  • Grub Street
  • Subscribe to the Magazine Give a Gift Subscription Buy Back Issues Current Issue Contents New York Shop
    Subscribe to New York Magazine
  • Subscribe
  • Profile
    Sign Out
  • TV
  • Movies
  • Comedy
  • Music
  • TV Recaps
  • What to Stream
  • Vulture Lists
  • Books
  • Theater
  • Art
  • Awards
  • Podcasts
  • About
  • Newsletters
  • Vulture Insiders
  • Video
  • Vulture Festival
  • NYMag.com
  • New York Magazine
  • Intelligencer
  • Vulture
  • The Cut
  • The Strategist
  • Grub Street
  • Curbed
Subscribe Give A Gift
  • TV
  • Movies
  • Comedy
  • Music
  • TV Recaps
  • What to Stream
  • Vulture Lists
  • Books
  • Theater
  • Art
  • Awards
  • Podcasts
  • About
  • Newsletters
  • Vulture Insiders
  • Video
  • Vulture Festival
  • NYMag.com
  • New York Magazine
  • Intelligencer
  • Vulture
  • The Cut
  • The Strategist
  • Grub Street
  • Curbed
jerry saltz
September 16, 2012

Saltz: The Met’s ‘Regarding Warhol’ Has Nothing to Say

By Jerry Saltz

Share

  • Share
  • Tweet
  • Pin It
Photo: Courtesy of Mary Boone Gallery, New York and The Metropolitan Museum of Art

The Metropolitan Museum of Art is unsurpassed at presenting more than 50 centuries of work. I go there constantly, seeing things over and over, better than I’ve ever seen them before. Yet even we who love the Met know that with notable exceptions it has pooh-poohed, misconstrued, or messed up the art of the second half of the twentieth century pretty much since it was made. Now it’s doing it again — but worse.

There’s a shallow, pandering fecklessness to the pseudo-extravaganza “Regarding Warhol: Sixty Artists, Fifty Years.” Its underlying idea is so shopworn and flighty it can come as a surprise only to the Met: Andy Warhol’s art and what curators Marla Prather and Mark Rosenthal deem “the Warhol phenomenon” are really, really influential. Prather wonders, “Is there anyone who’s had a bigger influence?” Rosenthal offers, “I’m starting to think of Warhol’s impact like a meteor striking the Earth.” To prove what anyone who’s looked at art in the past 40 years already knows, they brought together about 50 artworks by Warhol, then installed them with approximately 100 works by other artists. Nearly all the other artists are usual suspects from the ­aesthetic-economic auction complex, blue-chippers like Damien Hirst, Takashi Murakami, Jeff Koons, Richard Prince, John Currin, Douglas Gordon, Anselm Kiefer, and Francesco Vezzoli. (All of whom just happen to show with Gagosian Gallery. Why not subtitle the show “Larry’s Got Talent”? Or “Comfortably Numb.”)

“Regarding Warhol” has the unusual distinction of being a very bad show with very good work. The exhibition takes fantastic advantage of the Met’s space and reach. Almost every Warhol is first-rate and in excellent condition. Yet you wish instead of sections about celebrity and appropriation, the show had taken on more abstract but far deeper Warholian content like hoarding, neediness, and disembodiment. After all, this is the artist who said, “Sex is so abstract.” There’s barely anything here about some of his favorite tools, like the tape recorder and the Polaroid instant camera. Why not have the courage of your own convictions and include Martha Stewart, who utterly followed Andy’s footsteps around the businesses of décor, branding, and endorsement? The show avoids great but problematic work like Warhol’s “cock drawings” (or the Brigid Polk print of Jasper Johns’s penis owned by Warhol). Nor does it focus more on the 50 to 100 portrait commissions he did annually for around $50,000 apiece. Instead, everything looks crisp, way too crowded, and predictable: This is more like an auction sales room or a high roller’s private museum than an exhibition.

The show defangs everything. A Bruce Nauman neon work flashing the word DEATH, included because Andy also dealt with death, comes off as a bauble. A Basquiat skull-head is on hand, because skulls equal death, too. A Matthew Barney setup photo of someone with a gun? Yup, death again. So it goes, for ten long galleries. In the section grouped by celebrity, or maybe celebrity lips, near Warhol’s portraits of Elvis, Marilyn, and Brando, we see sexy lips in portraits by Chuck Close, Elizabeth Peyton, and Karen Kilimnik. Cindy Sherman is great, but the only reason she’s here (other than the fact that dull curators can’t do a show without her) is that she’s made a few pictures where she looks like a movie star, and Andy liked those sorts of people too. One gallery shows art of cars and gas stations. Ed Ruscha’s burning Standard station is near John Baldessari’s painting of a car and a Barney picture of five cars. By the last galleries I was so dispirited I’d look at the first work I’d see and predict what would come next. Cory Arcangel’s floating-clouds video? Warhol’s floating silver clouds. Murakami’s flower paintings? Flowers. (How’d ya know?) I don’t think I stumbled on a single surprising juxtaposition or one that deepened meaning.

By reducing everything this way, “Regarding Warhol” completely negates ­Andy’s radical way of making art, his astonishing ideas about color and skidding images, how he made art seem easy and being gay great, the ways he transformed commercial art into high art and high art into mass entertainment, how he turned himself into an icon, an anti-hero, and an ambience. The rest of the artists fare no better.

Everyone agrees that Andy is in the air we breathe. Yet artists whose work seems to resemble his also breathed other air. A number of the artists here defy the show’s conceit and insist that they weren’t influenced by Andy. Alex Katz’s early ideas about color and figures on flat grounds precede Warhol’s. In the catalogue, Katz jokes, “Good artists steal, and [Warhol is] a good artist.” Vija Celmins says she was “not interested” in what Warhol was up to back when she was making her own early black-and-white images of subjects like race riots from magazine covers. Though Chuck Close says Andy “was a great painter,” Katz says he was “a terrific graphic artist” but “he couldn’t paint.”

Last week, the Andy Warhol Foundation announced that it’s selling off its huge holdings of Andy’s work, converting itself from an estate into a cash fund that will give artists’ grants. It’ll effectively be doing what the Metropolitan purports to be trying here: making real, meaningful connections between Warhol’s legacy and new, vital work. Meanwhile, up at the Met, what we’re left with is a cynical gimmick to bring in the crowds and spruce up the museum’s image. Warhol, who loved commerce, will give it all away, whereas the Met, which is supposed to be above it all, will be raking it in. In the future, every museum will do fifteen Warhol shows. 

Regarding Warhol: Sixty Artists, Fifty Years
Metropolitan Museum of Art. Through December 31.

*This article originally appeared in the September 24, 2012 issue of New York Magazine.

View
1 / 8 Photos
Ai Weiwei (2010) Ai Weiwei (2010)

Ai Weiwei (2010)

Jeff Koons (1988) Jeff Koons (1988)

Jeff Koons (1988)

Ed Ruscha (1966) Ed Ruscha (1966)

Ed Ruscha (1966)

Alex Katz (1964) Alex Katz (1964)

Alex Katz (1964)

Photo: Digital Image ? The Museum of Modern Art/Licensed by SCALA / Art Resource, NY / ? Artres
Chuck Close (1969) Chuck Close (1969)

Chuck Close (1969)

Jean-Michel Basquiat (1981) Jean-Michel Basquiat (1981)

Jean-Michel Basquiat (1981)

Bruce Nauman (1972) Bruce Nauman (1972)

Bruce Nauman (1972)

Elizabeth Peyton (1995) Elizabeth Peyton (1995)

Elizabeth Peyton (1995)

1 / 8

Tags:

  • jerry saltz
  • andy warhol
  • regarding warhol
  • metropolitan museum of art
  • art
  • More

More Galleries

live from the pink carpet Sept. 12, 2023
See the Best Pink-Carpet Looks From the 2023 MTV VMAs  Well, well, Barbie’s impact. 
By Savannah Salazar
behind the scenes Aug. 15, 2023
Behind the Scenes on Riverdale, in Pictures  As the teen series shot its final episodes, we sent the stars disposable cameras and told them to go nuts. This is the result. 
By Vulture Editors
look book July 6, 2023
The Look Book Goes to Once Upon a One More Time  Britney Spears fans came from all over the country for opening weekend of a play inspired by her music. 
By Kelsie Schrader and Jenna Milliner-Waddell
great rooms July 3, 2023
The 11,000-Square-Foot Soho Loft ‘Bad Paintings’ Bought  When artist Neil Jenney paid just $36,000 for this full-floor space 1973, it was “completely unlivable.” 
By Wendy Goodman
look book Apr. 13, 2023
The Look Book Goes to Catherine Lacey’s Book Launch  On a recent Thursday, the novelist spoke to critic Merve Emre about her new book, Biography of X, at Greenlight Bookstore. 
By Kelsie Schrader and Jenna Milliner-Waddell
theater Feb. 13, 2023
Lorraine Hansberry Saw It Coming  Her nearly forgotten play The Sign in Sidney Brustein’s Window resurfaces at BAM, now with Oscar Isaac and Rachel Brosnahan. 
By Jackson McHenry
vulture homepage lede Feb. 5, 2023
All of the Best 2023 Grammys Red-Carpet Looks  Lizzo, Doja Cat, and more make the whole place [*Taylor Swift voice*] shimmer! 
By Savannah Salazar
sundance 2023 Jan. 27, 2023
As Seen at Sundance  The talk of the ski town at this year’s film festival. 
By Rebecca Alter and JJ Geiger
photo essay Nov. 9, 2022
‘My Hometown Thought I Was a Freak’  Down and out in New York City’s 1980s hardcore scene. 
By Caryn Rose
live from the black carpet Aug. 28, 2022
See Every Red-Carpet Look From the 2022 MTV VMAs  Lil Nas X, Taylor Swift, Måneskin, Lizzo and more are hitting the black carpet. 
By Savannah Salazar
first person Aug. 17, 2022
The Voice of New York Is Drill  It’s the most captivating sound the city has heard in decades — and also the most misunderstood. Here, 19 NY drill artists set the record straight. 
By Camille Squires
gallery July 19, 2022
Bradley Cooper As Bernstein  On the town and on the set with the biopic version of Lenny. 
By Justin Davidson
gallery June 23, 2022
The Faces of The Tribeca Film Festival 2022  Megan Fox, Robert De Niro, J. Lo, and more smize for the camera. 
By Vulture Editors
scenes May 18, 2022
PinkPantheress Fans Only  Everyone’s a main character at the anonymous singer’s live New York debut. 
By Rebecca Jennings
life in pictures Apr. 12, 2022
Sexy Cyrano  Behind the scenes at BAM with James McAvoy as he brings a smoldering version of de Bergerac Stateside. 
By Pari Dukovic
grammys 2022 Apr. 3, 2022
See Every Red Carpet Look From the 2022 Grammy Awards  Doja Cat, BTS, Olivia Rodrigo, Billie Eilish, and more. 
By Savannah Salazar
oscars 2022 Mar. 27, 2022
See Every Red-Carpet Look From the 2022 Oscars  As the cast of High School Musical 3 once said, “Tonight’s the night!” 
By Savannah Salazar
reasons to love new york Dec. 10, 2021
Snapshots of the City Where Movies Were Born  Because every street has a story to tell; all you need is a camera to tell it. 
By Vulture Editors
gallery Nov. 19, 2021
The Faces of Vulture Festival 2021  We welcomed Issa Rae, Henry Winkler, John Cho, and dozens of other stars (plus one good dog) to our photo studio. 
By Bobby Doherty
emmys 2021 Sept. 19, 2021
See Every Red Carpet Look from the 2021 Primetime Emmys  Michaela Coel, Elizabeth Olsen, Anya Taylor-Joy, and more grace the Emmys red carpet. 
By Savannah Salazar
More Galleries
  • TV
  • Movies
  • Comedy
  • Music
  • Books
  • What To Stream
  • About Vulture
  • About New York Magazine
  • Newsletters
  • Help
  • Contact
  • Press
  • Media Kit
  • We’re Hiring
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Ad Choices
  • Do Not Sell My Info
  • Accessibility
vulture is a Vox Media Network. © 2023 Vox Media, LLC. All rights reserved.