All look on in revulsion as terrorists yelling “We have avenged the Prophet Muhammad! Allahu akbar!” kill people for making and publishing drawings of the prophet Muhammad. Again, not to over-simply ideological fanaticism, and not even raising how smug, snotty, and obnoxious the cartoons actually are (were they racist or anti-Semitic and regularly published in America, all sorts of hell would be raised; guns, of course, eliminate all nuance), this non-random planned act was carried out because of a drawing. Killing for images is as primitively rooted and as complex as killing those who believe in one real or fictional God and not another. All four great monotheistic religions — Judaism, Christianity, Mohammedanism, and Zoroastrianism — are based on the Old Testament. About the making of images, the Second Commandment states, “Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image … for I the Lord thy God am a jealous God.” This is saying two things. First, that God permits abstraction and unhewn stone (Neolithic circles and the like) but proscribes that there be no realistic images. “Cursed be the man that maketh any graven or molten image.” Second, this God knows that there are other Gods out there — be it in Greece, Rome, Egypt, around the Tigress and Euphrates, over the steppes, in Northern Africa, sub-Saharan Africa, around the Mediterranean, the subcontinent of India, and the Far East. The Koran contains this imperious prohibition against images, as well.
Several parts of the Bible reinforce this injunction against realism. Deuteronomy states “the work of the hands of the craftsman is an abomination unto the Lord.” In a hadith, the Prophet Muhammad says, “The angels will not enter a home where there is an image.” A companion of the Prophet, Abd-Allaah ibn Mas’ood, says, “I heard the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) say: ‘The people who will be most severely punished on the Day of Resurrection will be the image-makers.’” Interestingly, ninth-century Islamic commentator Al-Azraqi says that on returning to Mecca, the Prophet found the Kaaba covered with paintings. He had all the paintings destroyed except for one depicting Mary and Jesus.
Over the millennia, the Second Commandment has led to incredible carnage. The Bible says, “Ye shall destroy their altars, break their images … ” Iconoclasts, or “image breakers,” killed people and destroyed countless works of art and architecture. Iconoclasts believe that images are not abstract representations of things but they are the thing itself and, as made not by God, they contain demonic spirits. The horrific paradox then is that these killers believe in the power and divinity of images, art, and architecture more than those who make the objects and who see what they make as abstract representations of ideas and things. A double paradox arises in so far as when the iconoclast kills because of an image he/she is eliminating and negating the judgment and vengeance of God, taking matters into his/her hands. Another layer of paradox forms in the minds of nonbelievers like me who believe that the gods that iconoclasts are killing for are, in actuality, superb works of fiction, written so beautifully and compellingly that their protagonist is worshiped as a god.
The destruction of objects has taken many forms — including razing entire libraries, temples, churches, and mosques — but often includes scratching out eyes or drawing a line across the figure’s neck to behead it. Sculptures have the face or head smashed and the eyes gouged out. The faces of paintings are often removed and burned. Far more art has been destroyed in the name of these four religions than has survived. Looked at through this prohibitive lens, it’s a wonder that any religious art survives at all.
The killers in Paris believed that the drawing was not a drawing but an incarnation of God, an invisible essence made flesh, an object wherein there was no distance between image and God. Whatever they believed, they took this belief to psychopathic levels.