Guerrilla’s Critics Say John Ridley’s New Show Erases Black Women Activists

John Ridley. Photo: Jerod Harris/Getty Images

Earlier this month, Oscar winner John Ridley told Vulture that representation is a primary concern in his filmmaking. “The thing that I want to do more than anything else is represent: both in front of the camera and behind it. I owe every good thing I have to Hollywood, but there’s a lack of representation of traditionally disenfranchised people,” he said. That position was challenged at the recent premiere of Guerrilla his mini-series for Showtime and Sky Atlantic about the rise of black revolutionaries in 1970s London — when the black writer-director was asked about being complicit in the erasure of black women from black history by casting an Indian woman, Freida Pinto, as one of the show’s stars.

“My parents were a part of [the black power movement],” an audience member said to Ridley after Guerrilla’s first episode was screened. “I want to understand why you decided [to make] an Asian woman the main protagonist.” In telling the story of black British activists, Ridley’s drama focuses on an interracial couple — Marcus and Jas, played by Babou Ceesay and Freida Pinto — liberating a political prisoner played by Idris Elba. Ridley was asked why there wasn’t a black woman character at the center of a show that’s about black revolution, and why the only black woman character included was a spy for a racist white police officer. “I understand the contribution of Asians to this, but having an Asian protagonist making all the big decisions,” the audience member continued. “Does that get explained in subsequent episodes? We can’t ignore that.”

At first, Ridley joked with the questioner (later identified by the i Paper as a Black Lives Matter U.K. activist), suggesting that her question was evidence of Pinto’s importance to Guerrilla’s narrative. “If everybody understood racism, oppression … there would be no reason to be doing this show. We would be doing Dancing With the Stars,” Ridley responded, according to Screen Daily. He then launched into an impassioned defense of Pinto’s casting, offering up his own interracial relationship as evidence of the importance of including other races in stories of black revolution. “I’m sorry I cannot entertain a dialogue about whether the lead character in this show should be black or Asian – the lead character in this show should be a strong woman of color,” Ridley said, eliciting applause from the audience.

But Ridley’s answer pivoted away from the central question about the representation of black women on Guerrilla, which was asked repeatedly: The female lead of a show about black revolution isn’t black, and the most prominent black woman in the first episode is working to support racism. Multiple accounts of the panel report a back and forth between Ridley and the audience that eventually left Pinto tearing up. (A journalist present at the event told The Independent that the actress seemed to tear up in response to Ridley’s words, not the critique of the show.) When a questioner said Guerrilla’s plot was a historically inaccurate portrayal of London’s black revolutionary movement, actor Babou Ceesay seemed to doubt her information, according to Screen Daily’s account:

Babou Ceesay, who plays one of the male leads in the show alongside Idris Elba, was taken aback by the suggestion: “Wow, really? You know this because you read about it?”

“No, we know this because our parents were a part of it,” responded the second questioner.

The debate surrounding Guerrilla — and the very question neither Ridley nor Pinto responded to — has little to do with Pinto’s talent or the show’s interracial relationship. The question of erasure and misogynoir and why Guerrilla’s first episode includes a negative depiction of black women remains unanswered. By making its most important black female character (in the first episode, at least) a spy for white racist interests, the audience members argued, the episode carries the implicit suggestion that not only were black women uninvolved with London’s black revolutionary movement, but that they actively worked against it. Ridley pointed to a handful of Asian activists who were part of the black revolutionary movement, while ignoring the larger and longer history of black women’s political organizing for racial justice.

Critics Say John Ridley’s Show Erases Black Women Activists